2023新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练

　　大学英语四级考试，即CET-4，College English Test Band 4的缩写，是由国家教育部高等教育司主持的全国性英语考试。考试的主要对象是根据教育大纲修完大学英语四级的在校专科生、本科生或研究生。大学英语四、六级标准化考试自1986年末开始筹备，1987年正式实施。下面是小编帮大家整理的2023新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练，希望能够帮助到大家。

　　新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练 篇1

　　From VOA Learning English, this is the Health & Lifestyle report.

　　There is a popular saying in the English language: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me."

　　Well, that is not true.

　　Unkind words, name-calling or even the so-called "the silent treatment" can hurt children as much as being physically hit, sometimes even more so.

　　A recent study of middle school children showed that verbal abuse by other children can harm development in the brain. The study was a project of researchers at Harvard Medical School in Massachusetts.

　　Researcher Martin Teicher and his team studied young adults, ages 18 to 25. These young men and women had no experience with domestic violence, sexual abuse or physical abuse by their parents.

　　The researchers asked the young people to rate their childhood exposure to verbal abuse from both parents and other children. Then the researchers performed imaging tests on the brains of the subjects.

　　The images showed that the individuals who reported suffering verbal abuse from their peers in middle school had underdeveloped connections between the left and right side of the brain.

　　The two sides of the brain are connected by a large bundle of connecting fibers called the corpus callosum. This was the area that was underdeveloped.

　　The middle school years are a time when these brain connections are developing. So, unkind, hurtful comments from children or adults during this period had the greatest effect.

　　The researchers tested the mental and emotional condition of all the young people in the study. The tests showed that this same group of individuals had higher levels of fear, depression, anger and drug abuse than others in the study.

　　The researchers published their findings online on the American Journal of Psychiatry's website.

　　We cannot control what other people say to our children. But we can prepare them. A website called CreativeWithKids.com suggests 64 things that all children need to hear.

　　Here, are our top 20.

　　I am curious what you think.

　　You are creative.

　　I believe in you.

　　You can ask for help.

　　You make me smile

　　I have faith in you.

　　You are imperfect. So am I.

　　You are a good friend.

　　I will do my best to keep you safe.

　　Trust your instincts.

　　My world is better with you in it.

　　I love you.

　　It's fun to do things with you.

　　You are valuable.

　　Your choices matter.

　　You can change your mind.

　　You make a difference.

　　I'm ready to listen.

　　You can learn from your mistakes.

　　I'm proud of you.

　　Share one or more of these statements with a child in your life. Actually, maybe we all need to hear some of these statements.

　　Choose another and say it to an adult you care about.

　　I'm Anna Matteo.

　　Anna Matteo wrote this for VOA Learning English. George Grow was the editor.

　　________________________________________________________________

　　Words in This Story

　　peer – n. a person who belongs to the same age group or social group as someone else

　　curious – adj. having a desire to learn or know more about something or someone

　　creative – adj. having or showing an ability to make new things or think of new ideas

　　faith – n. strong belief or trust in someone or something

　　instinct – n. something you know without learning it or thinking about it : a natural ability

　　valuable – adj. very useful or helpful

　　proud – adj. having a feeling of pleasure or satisfaction especially with a person's own achievements or with someone else's achievements

　　新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练 篇2

　　The future has arrived at a dairy farm about in an hour by car from Washington D.C. A robot is milking cows. It is milking time at Woodbourne Creamery in Mt. Airy, Maryland. The cows are standing in line for a turn at the robot.

　　John Fendrick is the owner of the farm. He inspects the progress of the animals by looking at a computer screen. That is all he has to do.

　　"The door of the milk opens up, they walk in, they get milked. The door opens up, they walk out."

　　John Fendrick checks the progress on the screen.

　　The robot does all the work. It uses a laser to find each teat -- the place on the cow where the milk comes out. The robot then cleans the teat and connects a milking tube to it.

　　The robot also tests the milk for possible contamination. If it finds a problem, it rejects the milk. When the amount of milk coming out of the cow slows, the machine knows to stop, and sends the cow on its way.

　　Milking robots are becoming popular among dairy farmers in the United States, Europe and Australia. John Fendrick says the robots have changed life on a dairy farm.

　　"You are giving the freedom back. So it allows me or the people work for me to actually do other things on the farm."

　　Most dairy farmers must milk their cows two times a day, early in the morning and late at night. The animals are milked everyday in good weather or bad. But Mr Fendrick's cows do not follow such schedule, they stay in the field until they want to be milked by the robot. Some of them come to be milked in the middle of the night.

　　Mr Fendrick doesn't even need to be there to watch his cows be milked. He can watch from his telephone. He can learn when each cow was milked and how much she produced. He can also learn if a cow has not been milked for a long time.

　　The cow milking robot is not low cost technology. Mr Fendrick paid more than $150,000 for it. But he notes, paying someone to milk the cows is also costly.

　　"In three years, I will have paid off the difference with this, and I don't have to be the person who's always on call to milk. The fact that we have a life, and our cows are able to function without us -- to us, it's well worth the money."

　　And he says that is a good thing. "I don't like to milk." With the robot, he can turn his attention to other things. He gets about 475 liters of milk a day, and he never has to touch a cow.

　　And that's the Agriculture Report from VOA Learning English. For more agriculture stories, go to our website 51voa.com. I'm Caty Weaver.

　　新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练 篇3

　　The U.S. Supreme Court says the University of Texas can consider race when deciding which students to admit. The case was one of the most closely watched because it deals with the issue of affirmative action.

　　Affirmative action is a policy designed to help those who suffer from discrimination, especially regarding employment or education.

　　The decision has nationwide implications because other American universities use similar affirmative action policies. However, eight U.S. states do not allow race to be used when considering public college admissions. The states are Arizona, California, Florida, Michigan, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

　　By law, the University of Texas guarantees admission to students who graduate in the top 10 percent of their high school class. But when considering applications from about 25 percent of students, the University of Texas also considers the student’s race, along with other factors.

　　The 4-3 Supreme Court decision means the university’s admissions policy can remain.

　　Abigail Fisher, a white woman, filed the case against the University of Texas. She said the school denied her admission based on her race.

　　Fisher’s grades were not good enough to get her automatic admission under the top 10 percent rule. She was denied admission to the University of Texas in 2008.

　　When she found out that minority students with lower grades than hers were accepted, she sued the school for discrimination. The University of Texas said Fisher would not have been admitted with or without race as a factor.

　　The university says its race-based selection policies are necessary to maintain adiverse campus community. Fisher’s attorneys argued that the top 10 percent program is enough to make sure that adequate minority students are included in the admissions process.

　　Justice Anthony Kennedy gave the majority opinion for the court. “The university has thus met its burden of showing that the admissions policy it used... was narrowlytailored,” he wrote.

　　Kennedy also said that “it remains an enduring challenge to our nation's education system to reconcile the pursuit of diversity with the constitutional promise of equal treatment and dignity.”

　　Three other judges - Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas – disagreed.

　　Alito said he thought the decision was an example of “affirmative action goneberserk.” He said he felt the university had relied "on a series of unsupported andnoxious racial assumptions."

　　In a separate dissent, Thomas expressed his view that the U.S. Constitution makes it illegal to use race as part of the admissions process in higher education.

　　U.S. President Barack Obama praised the Supreme Court’s decision for upholding “the basic notion that diversity is an important value in our society, and that this country should provide a high quality education to all our young people, regardless of their background.”

　　I’m Bryan Lynn.

　　________________________________________________________________

　　Words in This Story

　　factor – n. something that produces or influences a certain result

　　automatic – adj. happening by itself with little human involvement

　　diverse – adj. showing a lot of differences and variety

　　adequate – adj. acceptable in quality or quantity

　　tailor – v. adapt for a particular purpose or person

　　reconcile – v. restore friendly relations

　　dissent – n. the expression of opinions different from others

　　berserk – adj. out of control with anger or excitement

　　noxious – adj. harmful or unpleasant

　　新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练 篇4

　　Passage 30

　　Cartoonist

　　In a good cartoon, the artist can tell in a few lines as much as a writer can tell in half a dozen paragraphs. The cartoonist not only tells a story but he also tries to persuade the reader to his way of thinking. He has great influence on public opinion. In a political campaign, he plays an important part. Controversial issues in Congress or at meetings of the United Nations may keep the cartoonist well-supplies with current materials.

　　A clever cartoonist may cause laughter because he often uses humour in his drawings. If he is sketching a famous person, he takes a prominent feature and exaggerates it. Cartoonists, for instance, like to lengthen an already long nose and to widen an already broad grin. This exaggeration of a person’s characteristics is called caricature. The artist uses such exaggeration to put his message across. (144 words)

　　Passage 35

　　Soccer

　　Soccer has had a slow start in America. In fact, the majority of schools still have no official soccer teams or coaches. But the blossoming popularity of the game cannot be denied. Thanks to the efforts of some world-famous soccer stars, soccer is soon to have its place in American culture.

　　Although soccer has enjoyed decades of popularity elsewhere, it was literally ignored in America. Instead, a variation of the game called “football” was most popular in the U.S. and still is to this day. But the obvious advantages of playing soccer instead will soon win even most avid football enthusiasts.

　　For one thing, soccer is a much safer game to play than football. No one deliberately tries to knock an opponent down in soccer. In fact, the players are discouraged from even touching each other.

　　Soccer is a game that requires skill and dexterity in controlling the ball. Since no one may use hand to do this, soccer players soon acquire incredible control of their heads, knees, and feet. (171 words.)

【新题型大学英语四级考试听力训练】上海花千坊相关的文章：

大学英语四级听力考试Conversation 题型辅导11-22

英语四级听力新题型应试技巧03-24

2024年6月英语四级考试听力新题型06-08

英语四级听力新题型解析及答题技巧03-16

英语四级新题型作文范文训练11-30

大学英语四级考试听力试题辅导训练09-20

大学生英语四级考试阅读标准题型训练11-19

大学英语四级考试听力历年真题训练03-30

英语四级新题型作文训练第21练11-30